[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main About journal Editorial Board Current Issue Archive Submit an article Site Map Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2014) ::
Int J Med Invest 2014, 3(2): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
CITATION AND SELF-CITATION RATES OF IRANIAN AND TURKISH JOURNALS INDEXED IN ISI
Safoora Masoumi, Zahra Foroughi * , Mohsen Arabi , Leila Shokohi , Fateme Ghaffari , Saravi, Ensieh Taghizadeh , Reza Alizadeh-Navaei , Hojjatolah bahrami
Abstract:   (9942 Views)
In recent years,the growth rate of scientific production is increasing noticeabley.Citation analysis is currently one of the most widely used metrics for analyzing the scientific contribution of any units. Self-citation is a common practice but it can differ between disciplines, countries and journals. In this study we evaluated the impact factor (IF), citations and self-citations of Iranian and Turkish journals indexed in Web of Science based on the Journal Citation Report(JCR) 2012. We used the ISI-database journal citation report from Thomson-Reuters, JCR 2012, to collectjournals` impact factors, number of articles, number of citations and self-citationsfor both Turkey and Iran from 2009 to 2010 (which was used to calculate the impact factor of 2011). The mean, median and percentiles of each variableswere compared between countries using theIndependent Student t-test or Mann-Whithney U test in the case of violation of normal distribution. In addition therelationship between the number of publicationsand impact factor was studied by using the pearson correlation coefficient. Based on the 2012 JCR report, the total number of Iranian and Turkish articles were 4017 and 7260 respectively and themean self-citations were 26% for journals from both countries. The median of total IF was greater in Iranian journals as opposed to the Turkish one’s, 0.466 vs 0.349. The figure was similar for IF without self-citations, 0.330 vs 0.243, however both differences were statistically non-significant, p-values>0.05.A significant correlation was seen between the number of published articles and IF without self-citationsfor Iranian journals, r=0.342 and p-value=0.034. Although self-citation is quite high in both countries, Iranian journals had higher IF (total and without self-citation) compared to the Turkish journals.
Keywords: Citation, self-citation, Iranian journal, Turkish journal, ISI
Full-Text [PDF 266 kb]   (2764 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safoora Masoumi, Zahra Foroughi, Mohsen Arabi, Leila Shokohi, Fateme Ghaffari, Saravi, Ensieh Taghizadeh, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei et al . CITATION AND SELF-CITATION RATES OF IRANIAN AND TURKISH JOURNALS INDEXED IN ISI. Int J Med Invest 2014; 3 (2)
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-69-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2014) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Medical Investigation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645