[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main About journal Editorial Board Current Issue Archive Submit an article Site Map Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 4 (december 2014) ::
Int J Med Invest 2014, 3(4): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy Randomized study in king Hussien Medical Centre Amman/Jordan.
Haitham Suleiman Al-Rbiehat * , Abdulhamid M.Al-Abbadi , Sahel Haddadin , Raed Aljarrah
Abstract:   (8322 Views)
Abstract Laparoscopic appendectomy is a new procedure as compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now considerd a standard method of performing cholecystectomy and has replaced the old method generally throughout the world, while appendectomy could not achieve the similar popularity. In this paper a randomized study was done to compare between both laparoscopic and open appendectomy. PATIENTS AND METHOD In order to compare the two techniques, patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were compared to patients undergoing open appendectomy over a period of 36 months. Those patients who had perforated appendicitis were excluded. Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (N=126) had an average age of 25.7±1.5 (range 16-59). These patients were compared to 159 patients undergoing open. RESULTS Variables evaluated were operating room time, days until patient tolerated a regular diet, days of hospitalization, postoperative pain and wound infection rate. Mean operative time was 55minutes for lap. Appendectomy (LA) and 25 minutes for open appendectomy (OA). One day hospitalization in LA and two days in OA. Postoperative pain continued for 12 hours in LA while in OA for 36 hours. Rate of wound infection was 9 out of 159 in OA while none in LA. CONCLUSION We have to analyze very critically that do we need a procedure which gives us a small scar which is more cosmetic and acceptable with minimum, hospital stay & off work BUT serious postoperative complications or should we stick to the previous gold standard and well established method of open appendectomy with lesser chances of intra-abdominal abscesses / perforation of bowel. We believe it would be very early and immature to say that laparoscopic is superior or can replace open appendectomy.
Full-Text [PDF 256 kb]   (2515 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Al-Rbiehat H S, M.Al-Abbadi A, Haddadin S, Aljarrah R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy Randomized study in king Hussien Medical Centre Amman/Jordan.. Int J Med Invest 2014; 3 (4)
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-85-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 4 (december 2014) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Medical Investigation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645