Journal of Emergency Health Care
Formerly known as: International Journal of Medical Investigation
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2-2025)
J Emerg Health Care 2025, 14(1): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mahmoudi E, pournajaf A, jalounejad A H, bagheri T, seyedmajidi S, Ghafari M Z. Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of two Methods of Single Cone Filling and Lateral Compression with two Sealers AH26 and Endoseal MTA. J Emerg Health Care 2025; 14 (1) : 2
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-1247-en.html
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-1247-en.html
Elham Mahmoudi 
, Abazar Pournajaf , Amir hosein Jalounejad , Tasnim Bagheri , Seyedali Seyedmajidi , Mahya Zahra Ghafari *
, Abazar Pournajaf , Amir hosein Jalounejad , Tasnim Bagheri , Seyedali Seyedmajidi , Mahya Zahra Ghafari *
Endodontics Resident, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences,Mazandaran,Iran
Abstract: (627 Views)
Background:
Root canal sealers are effective in completely filling the root canal by reducing apical and coronal microleakage. The purpose of this study is to compare the bacterial microleakage of two methods of single cone filling and lateral compression with two sealers AH26 and Endoseal MTA.
Methods:
56 single-rooted teeth less than 1 mm from the apical foramen were cleaned and shaped with Sx to F3 files of the Protaper gold system along with washing with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and sterilized by UV rays. Then they were divided into four groups (n=14) based on the type of sealer (Endoseal MTA or AH26) and canal filling method (side density or single cone). In each group, one positive control sample and one negative control sample were considered. Then the canal of the teeth was filled according to their group. The separate compartment model was used to investigate bacterial leakage with enterococcus faecalis bacteria. The samples were placed in an incubator and observed for 90 days. The day of turbidity of the culture medium of each sample was recorded. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software and through chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis and Kaplan-Meier analyzes by log-rank test.
Results:
The highest number of teeth that suffered microleakage in the 90-day interval was observed in the Endoseal MTA group using the lateral compression method (91.7%) and the lowest number of microleakage was observed in the AH26 group using the single cone method (66.7%); However, no statistically significant relationship was found between the number of occurrences of microleakage and the studied groups (P=0.468).
Conclusion:
Considering the limitations of this study, no difference was observed in the use of AH26 and Endoseal MTA sealers with single cone and lateral compression methods in preventing bacterial microleakage. However, it seems that for Endoseal MTA sealer, using the single cone method will bring better results.
Article number: 2
References
1. Safai P, Farzaneh B, Fekrazad R. The effects of pressure in vitro on three methods of root canal obturation. Diving and hyperbaric medicine. 2019;49(1):16. https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm49.1.16-20 , PMid:30856663 PMCid:PMC6526054
2. Yanpiset K, Banomyong D, Chotvorrarak K, Srisatjaluk RL. Bacterial leakage and micro-computed tomography evaluation in round-shaped canals obturated with bioceramic cone and sealer using matched single cone technique. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2018;43(3).
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e30, PMid:30135849 PMCid:PMC6103543
3. Kim SR, Kwak SW, Lee JK, Goo HJ, Ha JH, Kim HC. Efficacy and retrievability of root canal filling using calcium silicate‐based and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers with matched obturation techniques. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2019;45(3):337-45.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12323, PMid:30614168
4. Mobarak A, Moussa S, Zaazou A, Abdelfattah H. Comparison of bacterial coronal leakage between different obturation materials (an in vitro study). Alexandria Dental Journal. 2015;40(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2015.56488
5. El Sayed MAAM, Al Husseini H. Apical dye leakage of two single-cone root canal core materials (hydrophilic core material and gutta-percha) sealed by different types of endodontic sealers: An: in vitro: study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2018;21(2):147-52.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_154_17, PMid:29674815 PMCid:PMC5890403
6. Bahlakeh M, Omidi S, Lomee M, Cherati J. Microleakage assessment of a new mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealer in the presence and absence of saliva. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2018;2018:6.
7. Moazami F, Naseri M, Malekzadeh P. Different application methods for endoseal MTA sealer: a comparative study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2020;15(1):44.
8. Lin GSS, Ghani NRNA, Noorani TY, Kamarudin A. Apical sealing ability of different endodontic sealers using glucose penetration test: a standardized methodological approach. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2020;23(2):79-87. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.704107
9. Kim S, Kim S, Park J-W, Jung I-Y, Shin S-J. Comparison of the percentage of voids in the canal filling of a calcium silicate-based sealer and gutta percha cones using two obturation techniques. Materials. 2017;10(10):1170.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101170, PMid:29023402 PMCid:PMC5666976
10. Kim J-A, Hwang Y-C, Rosa V, Yu M-K, Lee K-W, Min K-S. Root canal filling quality of a premixed calcium silicate endodontic sealer applied using gutta-percha cone-mediated ultrasonic activation. Journal of endodontics. 2018;44(1):133-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.023, PMid:29102078
11. Yazdi KA, Aminsobhani M, Alemi P. Comparing the ability of different materials and techniques in filling artificial internal resorption cavities. European endodontic journal. 2019;4(1):21-7. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.13008, PMid:32161882 PMCid:PMC7006561
12. Patel D, Sherriff M, Ford TP, Watson T, Mannocci F. The penetration of RealSeal primer and Tubliseal into root canal dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study. International endodontic journal. 2007;40(1):67-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01184.x
13. Sagsen B, Ustün Y, Demirbuga S, Pala K. Push‐out bond strength of two new calcium silicate‐based endodontic sealers to root canal dentine. International endodontic journal. 2011;44(12):1088-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01925.x
14. Turkyilmaz A, Erdemir A. Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2020;83(12):1544-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23548
15. Jafari F, Samadi Kafil H, Jafari S, Aghazadeh M, Momeni T. Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals. Iran Endod J 2016 [acceso: 14/01/2019]; 11 (3).
16. Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Shalavi S. Antibacterial activity of a new mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealer. International dental journal. 2012;62(2):70-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00090.x , PMid:22420474 PMCid:PMC9374948
17. Milani AS, Firuzi S, Barhaghi MHS, Shahi S, Abdollahi AA. Evaluation of sealing abilitiy of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with propylene glycol as a root canal sealer: A: in vitro: study. Dental research journal. 2019;16(4):216-20.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.261124, PMid:31303874 PMCid:PMC6596174
18. Drukteinis S, Peciuliene V, Maneliene R, Bendinskaite R. In vitro study of microbial leakage in roots filled with EndoREZ sealer/EndoREZ Points and AH Plus sealer/conventional gutta-percha points. Stomatologija. 2009;11(1):21-5
19. Adanir N, Cobankara FK, Belli S. Sealing properties of different resin‐based root canal sealers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006;77(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30408
20. Samiei M, Aghazade M, Farhadi F, Shahveghar N, Torab A, Pakdel SMV. Sealing efficacy of single-cone obturation technique with MTA and CEM cement: an in vitro bacterial leakage study. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects. 2014;8(2):77.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |