[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main About journal Editorial Board Current Issue Archive Submit an article Site Map Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 2 (6-2024) ::
Int J Med Invest 2024, 13(2): 43-50 Back to browse issues page
Comparison Of Intrathecal Injection Of Dexmedetomidine And Bupivacaine With Bupivacaine Alone On Hemodynamic Changes In Pregnant Women Candidates For Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Study
Ali Jabari , Monireh Jahani , Seyedeh Roya Mousavi , Mansour Deylami *
. Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Abstract:   (591 Views)
Background: In choosing the anesthesia method, spinal anesthesia is more preferable for cesarean surgery. In cesarean surgery, it is very important to know the drug that has more hemodynamic stability, which can be useful in choosing the most suitable drug. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of comparing intrathecal injection of dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine with bupivacaine alone on hemodynamic changes in pregnant women candidates for caesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 82 pregnant women candidates for cesarean surgery. Patients were divided into two intervention (dexmedetomidine-bupivacaine) and control (bupivacaine) groups by random block method. Hemodynamic symptoms (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate) were recorded and measured at 1, 3, 5, 30 and 60 minutes during surgery.
Results: The average age of 82 patients was 29.41±4.75 years. The average duration of surgery was 158.78±19.26 minutes in the intervention group and 127.31±23.02 minutes in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of dexmedetomidine-bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone at times 1, 3, 5, 30 and 60 during surgery in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of heart rate at time 1, 3 and 60 during surgery, but at time 5 and 30 during surgery, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. In the dexmedetomidine-bupivacaine group, the heart rate was significantly lower than the bupivacaine group (P=0.03, P=0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that there is no difference between the two groups in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but the use of the combination of dexmedetomidine-bupivacaine had a certain effect on the heart rate at 5 and 30 minutes during cesarean surgery. At the same time, it is suggested to conduct more studies in this field.
 
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Bupivacaine, Hemodynamics, Caesarean Section, Spinal anesthesia.
Full-Text [PDF 953 kb]   (102 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
References
1. 1. Bryson GL, MacNeil R, Jeyaraj LM, Rosaeg OP. Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2007; 54(7):531-7. 2. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;2010:444-64. 3. Van de Velde M, Van Schoubroeck D, Jani J, Teunkens A, Missant C, Deprest J. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2006; 103(1):187-90. 4. Vatankhah M, Sadeghi SE, Zarenezhad M, Rasekh Jahromi A, Kalani N, Hatami N, et al. Low doses of propofol and midazolam on maternal hemodynamic symptoms and neonatal Apgar in women undergoing spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2021; 24(2):41-9. 5. Scibelli G, Maio L, Sasso M, Lanza A, Savoia G. Dexmedetomidine: Current Role in Burn ICU. Transl Med UniSa 2017;16:1-10. 6. Grunebaum MF, Ellis SP, Keilp JG, Moitra VK, Cooper TB, Marver JE, et al. Ketamine versus midazolam in bipolar depression with suicidal thoughts: A pilot midazolam‐controlled randomized clinical trial. Bipolar Disord 2017;19(3):176-83 7. Alikhani R, Shafiee H, Mohajerani S, Mahdavi A, Razavi S, Aminnezhad R. Comparing perioperative anxiolytic and analgesic effects of clonidine and midazolam in pediatric patients. Journal of Iranian Society of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care. 2016;2(2):4-13. 8. Safari F, Mottaghi K, Salimi A, Rezaee O, Zahabi-Aslee M, Nashibi M. Evaluation of the effect of dexmedetomidine on the acute hyperdynamic responses, duration of seizure activity and recovery times in patients undergoing ECT. Journal of Iranian Society of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care. 2016;2(1):62-7. 9. Hashemian M, Ahmadinejad M, Mohajerani SA, Mirkheshti A. Impact of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic changes during and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Card Anaesth 2017; 20(2):152. 10. Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012;307(11):1151-60. 11. Alhashemi JA. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for monitored anesthesia care during cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96(6):722-6. 12. Sadeghi, E., Radmehr, M., Damshenas, M. H., Sahraeai, R., Rahmanian, M., Kalani, N., Rastgarian, A. Effect of Dexmedetomidine in combination with intrathecal bupivacaine on the incidence of shivering after orthopedic surgery of the femur and tibia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial study. Pars Journal of Medical Sciences, 2022; 17(4): 26-32. 13. Ghazi A, Yosefian M, Zandyan H, Habibzadeh E. Comparison of the Effect of Intrathecal Bupivacaine with Intrathecal Ropivacaine on Hemodynamic of Patients under Elective Caesarean Section. JAP 2022; 12 (4) :60-71 14. Rastegarian A, Sadeghi S E, Damshenas M H, Ghanei M, Kalani N, Hemati H et al . Effects of administration of dexmedetomidine with intrathecal bupivacaine on analgesia after femoral and tibia orthopedic surgery: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study. Koomesh 1399; 22 (4) :678-685 15. Demiraran Y, Korkut E, Tamer A, Yorulmaz I, Kocaman B, Sezen G, Akcan Y. The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective randomized study. CJGH. 2007; 21(1):25-9. 16. Al-Waili N, Saloom KY. The analgesic effect of intravenous tenoxicam in the symptomatic treatment of biliary colic. Eur J Med Res. 1998;14:475-9. 17. Alikhani R, Shafiee H, Mohajerani S, Mahdavi A, Razavi S, Aminnezhad R. Comparing perioperative anxiolytic and analgesic effects of clonidine and midazolam in pediatric patients. Journal of Iranian Society of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care. 2016;2(2):4-13. 18. Salimi A, Sharifi G, Bahrani H, Mohajerani S, Jafari A, Safari F, et al. Dexmedetomidine could enhance surgical satisfaction in trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg Sci. 2014. 19. Owczuk R, Weaski W, Polak Krzeminska AT, wardowski P. Ondansetrone given int. venously attenuates arterial blood pressure drop due to spinal anesthesia: a double blind controlled study. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2008; 33(4):332-9 20. Khosravi F, Sharifi M, Jarineshin H. Comparative Study of Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2020 Oct 7; 13:2475-2482. 21. Amini-Saman, J., Alikhani, M., Nadersepahi, M. J., Rahmani, S. Comparison of the Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil Added to Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine for Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Analgesia in Elective Cesarean Section Surgery: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal (IRCMJ), 2023; 25(3): 22. Zirak N, Hafizi L, Eftekharzadeh S, Ghomian N, Moradifar M, Golmakani E. Evaluating the Effect of Regular-Dose of Bupivacaine against its Low-Dose plus Fentanyl in Spinal Anesthesia of Elective Cesarean Section on Term Neonatal Apgar Score and Time of Sensory-Block Regression. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, 2012; 15(20): 12-18. 23. Rahimzadeh P, Faiz SH, Imani F, Derakhshan P. Amniati S. Comparative addition of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic procedure in lower limbs BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18: 62 24. Harsoor SS, Vikram MS. Spinal anesthesia with low doses bupivacaine with fentanyl for cesarean section. SAARC J Anaesth 2008;1(2):142-5. 25. Philipp M, Brede M, Hein L. Physiological significance of alpha (2)-adrenergic receptor subtype diversity: one receptor is not enough. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283: 287-295. 26. Jie K, Van Brummelen P, Vermey P, Timmermans PB, Van Zwieten PA. Identification of vascular postsynaptic alpha and alpha 2-adrenoceptors in man. Circ Res 1984; 54: 447-452
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jabari A, Jahani M, Mousavi S R, Deylami M. Comparison Of Intrathecal Injection Of Dexmedetomidine And Bupivacaine With Bupivacaine Alone On Hemodynamic Changes In Pregnant Women Candidates For Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Study. Int J Med Invest 2024; 13 (2) :43-50
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-1142-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 2 (6-2024) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Medical Investigation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660