[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main About journal Editorial Board Current Issue Archive Submit an article Site Map Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 1 (3-2020) ::
Int J Med Invest 2020, 9(1): 50-59 Back to browse issues page
Characteristics of Non-Syndromic Supernumerary Teeth in (a Group of Turkish) Children
Yelda Kasimoglu , Mine Koruyucu * , Figen Seymen
2. DDS, Assoc.Prof., Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract:   (4711 Views)
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, distribution, gender differences and characteristics of non-syndromic supernumerary (SN) teeth in children and adolescents.
 
Methods: In a 2 year cross-sectional study, a total of 16,986 patients aged between 6-14 years who visited our department between April 2014 and April 2016 were revised. 100 cases of supernumerary teeth were found. Patients with SN teeth were evaluated for demographic data (age and sex), location, morphology, classification and number of the SN teeth and related complications. The distribution rates of SN tooth types and the distribution of complications between sex and age groups were analyzed. Likelihood ratio test was used for statistical comparisons.
 
Findings: The prevalence of non-syndromic SN teeth was 0.59%. The mean age of cases included in the study was 13.88 years (65% male and 35% female). The most common type of SN tooth was conical type (50%), while the supplemental (29.6%), tuberculate (16.7%) and odontoma (3.7%) types were also found. 92% of the cases had one SN tooth. SN teeth were mostly located in the maxilla (95.6%) and were mostly unilateral (55.3%); followed by bilateral (23.7%) and midline (21.1%). There was no statistically significant difference between the distribution of SN teeth between males and females (p>0.05). At least one complication was found in 40% of the cases.
 
Conclusion: SN teeth can cause a variety of complications. Careful and early clinical and radiographic examinations in children are important in order to prevent complications of SN teeth.
Keywords: Impacted Tooth, Supernumerary Teeth, Tooth Abnormalities, Dental Anomaly, Prevalence, Pediatricpatients.
Full-Text [PDF 452 kb]   (1176 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
References
1. 1. Omer RSM, Anthonappa RP, King NM. Determination of the optimum time for surgical removal of unerupted anterior supernumerary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:14–20. 2. Pan C-Y, Tseng Y-C, Lan T-H, Chang H-P. Craniofacial features of cleidocranial dysplasia. J Dent Sci. 2017;12:313–8. 3. Seehra J, Patel S, Bryant C. Gardner’s Syndrome revisited: a clinical case and overview of the literature. J Orthod. 2016;43:59–64. 4. Minić S, Novotny GEK, Trpinac D, Obradović M. Clinical features of incontinentia pigmenti with emphasis on oral and dental abnormalities. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:343–7. 5. Anthonappa RP, King NM, Rabie ABM. Aetiology of supernumerary teeth: a literature review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:279–88. 6. Sykaras SN. Mesiodens in primary and permanent dentitions: report of a case. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975;39:870–4. 7. Primosch RE. Anterior supernumerary teeth-assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent. 1981;3:204–15. 8. Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumerary teeth: a review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J. 1997;42:160–5. 9. Asaumi J-I, Shibata Y, Yanagi Y, Hisatomi M, Matsuzaki H, Konouchi H, et al. Radiographic examination of mesiodens and their associated complications. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2004;33:125–7. 10. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bachour Z, Parisis N, Tsirlis A. Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e56-61. 11. King N, Tongkoom S, Itthagarun A, Wong H, Lee C. A catalogue of anomalies and traits of the primary dentition of southern Chinese. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;32:139–46. 12. Van der Merwe AE, Steyn M. A report on the high incidence of supernumerary teeth in skeletal remains from a 19th century mining community from Kimberley, South Africa: scientific. South African Dent J. 2009;64:162–6. 13. Haque S, Alam MK. Common dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate patients. Malaysian J Med Sci MJMS. 2015;22:55. 14. Kumar DK, Gopal KS. An epidemiological study on supernumerary teeth: a survey on 5,000 people. J Clin diagnostic Res JCDR. 2013;7:1504. 15. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e575-8. 16. Esenlik E, Sayın MÖ, Atilla AO, Özen T, Altun C, Başak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:848–52. 17. Küchler EC, Costa AG da, Costa M de C, Vieira AR, Granjeiro JM. Supernumerary teeth vary depending on gender. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:76–9. 18. Kara Mİ, Aktan AM, Ay S, Bereket C, Şener İ, Bülbül M, et al. Characteristics of 351 supernumerary molar teeth in Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e395. 19. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Yildirim H, Ceylan I. The frequency and characteristics of mesiodens in a Turkish patient population. Eur J Dent. 2011;5:361. 20. Demiriz L, Durmuşlar MC, Mısır AF. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth: A survey on 7348 people. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5:S39. 21. Karadas M, Celikoglu M, Akdag MS. Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:337. 22. Ferrés-Padró E, Prats-Armengol J, Ferrés-Amat E. A descriptive study of 113 unerupted supernumerary teeth in 79 pediatric patients in Barcelona. Studies. 2009;14:46–52. 23. Leco Berrocal M, Martín Morales JF, Martínez González JM. An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral, Patol Oral y Cirugía Bucal. 2007;12:134–8. 24. Fernández Montenegro P, Valmaseda Castellón E, Berini Aytés L, Gay Escoda C. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral, Patol Oral y Cir Bucal. 2006;11(4):339-344. 25. Rajab LD, Hamdan MAM. Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:244–54. 26. Zilberman Y, Malron M, Shteyer A. Assessment of 100 children in Jerusalem with supernumerary teeth in the premaxillary region. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59:44–7. 27. Tay F, Pang A, Yuen S. Unerupted maxillary anterior supernumerary teeth: report of 204 cases. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984;51:289–94. 28. Leyland L, Batra P, Wong F, Llewelyn R. A retrospective evaluation of the eruption of impacted permanent incisors after extraction of supernumerary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006;30:225–32. 29. Koch H, Schwartz O, Klausen B. Indications for surgical removal of supernumerary teeth in the premaxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:273–81. 30. DE OLIVEIRA GOMES C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:98–106. 31. Mukhopadhyay S. Mesiodens: a clinical and radiographic study in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29:34. 32. Sharma A, Singh VP. Supernumerary teeth in Indian children: A survey of 300 cases. Int J Dent. 2012;745265. 33. Öztaş B, Bardak Ç, Kurşun EŞ, Akbulut N. Clinical characteristics of non-syndromic supernumerary teeth in a cohort of Turkish patients. Oral Radiol. 2011;27:108–13. 34. Bello S, Olatunbosun W, Adeoye J, Adebayo A, Ikimi N. Prevalence and presentation of hyperdontia in a non-syndromic, mixed Nigerian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:e930. 35. Altan H, Akkoc S, Altan A. Radiographic characteristics of mesiodens in a non‐syndromic pediatric population in the Black Sea region. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10:e12377. 36. Acıkgoz A, Acıkgoz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2006;35:185–90. 37. Khan SY. An Exploratory Study of Consanguinity and Dental Developmental Anomalies. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11:513. 38. Shokry SM, Alenazy MS. Consanguinity-related hyperdontia: An orthopantomographic study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10:732. 39. Cassia A, El-Toum S, Feki A, Megarbane A. Five mandibular incisors: an autosomal recessive trait? Br Dent J. 2004;197:307–9. 40. Goksel S, Agirgol E, Karabas HC, Ozcan I. Evaluation of Prevalence and Positions of Mesiodens Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018;9
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kasimoglu Y, Koruyucu M, Seymen F. Characteristics of Non-Syndromic Supernumerary Teeth in (a Group of Turkish) Children. Int J Med Invest 2020; 9 (1) :50-59
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-470-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 1 (3-2020) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Medical Investigation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645