International Journal of Medical Investigation
Sun, Jan 5, 2025
Volume 12, Issue 1 (3-2023)
Int J Med Invest 2023, 12(1): 1-7 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moeinian A, Fahim Z. Review Study of the Application of Nanofield Coatings in Restorative Materials with Base Glass Ionomer: Water Absorption and Solubility of Restorative Materials. Int J Med Invest 2023; 12 (1) :1-7
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-945-en.html
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-945-en.html
Department Of Operative Dentistry, Faculty Of Dentistry, Tabriz University Of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (1339 Views)
Background: Nanofilled resin-based coatings are a type of surface coating that consists of a resin matrix filled with nanoparticles, which offer several benefits over conventional resin-based coatings. Restorative materials with a base of glass ionomer have become increasingly popular in the field of dentistry over the past few decades. In this study we reviewed the application of nanofield coatings in restorative materials with base glass ionomer.
Methods: A narrative review.
Results and conclusion: There are limited research on impact of nanofield coatings on the water absorption and solubility of restorative materials with a base of glass ionomer, available studies suggest that such coatings may help improve water resistance and durability of these materials. The study by Jafarpour et al. specifically highlights the potential benefits of nanocoatings in reducing solubility and surface roughness of glass ionomer cement. However, more research is needed to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of nanocoatings for glass ionomer restorations, including their long-term performance and biocompatibility. In evaluating effects of nanofield coatings, it is important to consider characteristics of both coating and material being coated. Overall, advancements in nanotechnology may offer promising solutions for improving performance and longevity of restorative materials in the oral environment.
Methods: A narrative review.
Results and conclusion: There are limited research on impact of nanofield coatings on the water absorption and solubility of restorative materials with a base of glass ionomer, available studies suggest that such coatings may help improve water resistance and durability of these materials. The study by Jafarpour et al. specifically highlights the potential benefits of nanocoatings in reducing solubility and surface roughness of glass ionomer cement. However, more research is needed to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of nanocoatings for glass ionomer restorations, including their long-term performance and biocompatibility. In evaluating effects of nanofield coatings, it is important to consider characteristics of both coating and material being coated. Overall, advancements in nanotechnology may offer promising solutions for improving performance and longevity of restorative materials in the oral environment.
References
1. 1. Capek I, Capek I. Nanofield. Noble Metal Nanoparticles: Preparation, Composite Nanostructures, Biodecoration and Collective Properties. 2017:1-23.
2. Makhlouf AS. Current and advanced coating technologies for industrial applications. InNanocoatings and ultra-thin films 2011 Jan 1 (pp. 3-23). Woodhead Publishing.
3. Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. Journal of dentistry. 2008 Mar 1;36(3):186-93.
4. Ma IW, Sh A, Ramesh K, Vengadaesvaran B, Ramesh S, Arof AK. Anticorrosion properties of epoxy-nanochitosan nanocomposite coating. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2017 Dec 1;113:74-81.
5. Esfahani MR, Tyler JL, Stretz HA, Wells MJ. Effects of a dual nanofiller, nano-TiO2 and MWCNT, for polysulfone-based nanocomposite membranes for water purification. Desalination. 2015 Sep 15;372:47-56.
6. Kumar V, Kumar A, Han SS, Park SS. RTV silicone rubber composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes, titanium-di-oxide and their hybrid: Mechanical and piezoelectric actuation performance. Nano Materials Science. 2021 Sep 1;3(3):233-40.
7. Wang T, Wang W, Feng H, Sun T, Ma C, Cao L, Qin X, Lei Y, Piao J, Feng C, Cheng Q. Photothermal nanofiller-based polydimethylsiloxane anticorrosion coating with multiple cyclic self-healing and long-term self-healing performance. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022 Oct 15;446:137077.
8. Liu C, Yan B, Sun J, Dong X, Zheng J, Duan J, Hou B. Cu@ C core-shell nanoparticles modified polydimethylsiloxane-based coatings with improved static antifouling performance. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2022 Oct 1;171:107026.
9. Elgendy H, Maia RR, Skiff F, Denehy G, Qian F. Comparison of light propagation in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composite. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2019 Jan 29;23:423-33.
10. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Journal of functional biomaterials. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16.
11. El-Safty SM, El-Wakiel N, El-Oleimy G, Gaber M, El-Sayed YS. Microhardness and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with a Novel Al+ 3 Complex to Enhance Its Antimicrobial Activity. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2021 Oct 23;2021.
12. Dorieh A, Pour MF, Movahed SG, Pizzi A, Selakjani PP, Kiamahalleh MV, Hatefnia H, Shahavi MH, Aghaei R. A review of recent progress in melamine-formaldehyde resin based nanocomposites as coating materials. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2022 Apr 1;165:106768.
13. Moghimi M, Jafarpour D, Ferooz R, Bagheri R. Protective effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on wear resistance of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):317.
14. Khalid I, Anggani HS, Ismah N. Differences in Enamel Surface Roughness Changes after Debonding Using Resin Infiltration System and Nano-Filled Resin Coating. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2019;12(1):95-100.
15. Tiwari S, Srivastava K, Gehlot CL, Srivastava D. Epoxy/fly ash from thermal power plant/nanofiller nanocomposite: studies on mechanical and thermal properties: a review. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2020;10:1-6.
16. Wang X, Lin Z. Robust, hydrophobic anti-corrosion coating prepared by PDMS modified epoxy composite with graphite nanoplatelets/nano-silica hybrid nanofillers. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2021 Sep 15;421:127440.
17. Jafarpur D, Bagheri R. Evaluation of the effect of nanofilled resin-based coatings on water sorption and solubility of glass ionomer restorations. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2019 Mar 10;31(4):208-14.
18. Basso M. Teeth restoration using a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement: The Equia® system. Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry. 2011 Jan 1;4(3):74-6.
19. Mohammadi N, Bagheri R, Borazjani LV. Effect of the resin-based adhesive coating on the shear punch strength of Aesthetic restorative materials. Dental Hypotheses. 2021 Oct 1;12(4):189.
20. Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dental materials. 2009 Aug 1;25(8):1001-6.
21. Shatat F. The effect of resin based coatings on fluoride release of glass ionomer cement, an in vitro study. Magister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent) (Paediatric Dentistry). http://hdl.handle.net/11394/6399
22. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 1995 Oct;6(4):302-18.
23. Montoya C, Jain A, Londoño JJ, Correa S, Lelkes PI, Melo MA, Orrego S. Multifunctional dental composite with piezoelectric nanofillers for combined antibacterial and mineralization effects. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2021 Sep 8;13(37):43868-79.
24. da Cruz LB, Oliveira MT, Saraceni CH, Lima AF. The influence of nanofillers on the properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2019 Aug 1;44(3).
25. Sidhu SK. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject?. Australian dental journal. 2011 Jun;56:23-30.
26. Tay FR, Pashley EL, Huang C, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Smales RJ, Pashley DH. The glass-ionomer phase in resin-based restorative materials. Journal of Dental Research. 2001 Sep;80(9):1808-12.
27. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 1997 Jan 1;18(4):343-9.
28. Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements: 6. A study of erosion and water absorption in both neutral and acidic media. Journal of Dentistry. 1980 Jan 1;8(1):68-74.
29. Gemalmaz D, Yoruc B, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998 Oct 1;80(4):474-8.
30. Moheet IA, Luddin N, Ab Rahman I, Masudi SA, Kannan TP, Abd Ghani NR. Novel nano-hydroxyapatite-silica–added glass ionomer cement for dental application: Evaluation of surface roughness and sol-sorption. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2020 Jun;28(5):299-308.
31. Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer–Based restorative materials. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2019 Jun 1;22(6):824-32.
32. Jafarpour D, Mese A, Ferooz M, Bagheri R. The effects of nanofilled resin-based coatings on the physical properties of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. Journal of dentistry. 2019 Oct 1;89:103177.
33. Moradian M, Abadi MN, Jafarpour D, Saadat M. Effects of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals on the mechanical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. European Journal of Dentistry. 2021 May;15(02):197-201.
34. Moghaddasi N, Tavallali M, Jafarpour D, Ferooz R, Bagheri R. The effect of nanofilled resin-base coating on the mechanical and physical properties of resin composites. European Journal of Dentistry. 2021 May;15(02):202-9.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
