Journal of Emergency Health Care
Formerly known as: International Journal of Medical Investigation
Volume 7, Issue 1 (3-2018)
J Emerg Health Care 2018, 7(1): 98-102 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghaffari S, Shayesteh Azar M, Kariminasab M H, sharifi F. Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament by Hamstring Graft Endobutton vs Rigidfix. J Emerg Health Care 2018; 7 (1) :98-102
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-308-en.html
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-308-en.html
Orthopedic Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University Of Medical Sciences, Sari, I.R. Iran.
Abstract: (7535 Views)
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common sport injury. In recent years hamstring ligaments have become the most widely used graft for ACL reconstruction. One important issue is type of femoral side graft fixation. We compared the clinical outcomes of two femoral side fixation methods, endobutton and Rigidfix. Methods: From March 2014 to March 2016, 147 patients with ACL tear were treated by arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autogenous quadruple hamstring graft. Femoral side fixation was performed with endobutton or Rigidfix. Demographic and perioperative data were collected from hospital documents. Patients were evaluated using objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm Knee Scores. Findings: 87 (59%)cases (48 endobutton and 39 Rigidfix) were accessible for final evaluation. Mean duration of follow up was 18(range 17-22) months. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), damage mechanism, activity level and postoperative pain, limp, subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores. Pivot shift test was normal in all cases of both groups. Anterior translation of more than three millimeter in comparison with intact knee in 30o and 90o of flexion was seen in 3(6.25%) and 3(7.69%) of endobutton and Rigidfix cases,respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between endobutton and Rigifix using subjective scores. Rotary and anteroposterior stability was similar. Both fixation methods result in a stable knee.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, reconstruction, Endobutton, Rigidfix, Lysholm score, IKDC score
References
1. 1. Irarrázaval S, Kurosaka M, Cohen M, Fu FH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of ISAKOS: Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. 2016 Jan 1;1(1):38-52.2.Persson A, Fjeldsgaard K, Gjertsen JE, Kjellsen AB, Engebretsen L, Hole RM, FevangJM. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. The American journal of sports medicine. 2014 Feb;42(2):285-91.3.Miller MD. Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Clinics in sports medicine. 2017;36(1): xiii.4.Wu S, Zheng Y, Yan K, Lin W, Xu W, Kang J. Effectiveness Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Long Fibular Muscle Tendon and Hamstring Tendon. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi= Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi= Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2015 Nov;29(11):1358-63.5. Tahmasbi M, Jalali MS, Shahriar KR. quadruple hamstring versus patellar tendongrafts in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. 2005 spring;4(3):31-396.Aydin D, Ozcan M. Evaluation and comparison of clinical results of femoral fixation devices in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Knee. 2016;23(2):227-32.7.Kostov H, Kaftandziev I, Arsovski O, Kostova E, Gavrilovski A. Clinical Outcomes of Three Different Modes of Femoral Hamstring Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Macedonian Medical Review. 2014 Apr 1;68(1):44-7.8.Ho W-P, Lee C-H, Huang C-H, Chen C-H, Chuang T-Y. Clinical Results of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Femoral Knot/Press-Fit Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2014;30(7):823-32.9.Feagin JA, Curl WW. Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1976;4(3):95-100.10.Zysk SP, Krüger A, Baur A, Veihelmann A, Refior HJ. Tripled semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Endobutton fixation: a 2-3-year follow-up study of 35 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2000;71(4):381-6.11.Longo UG, CiuffredaM, Casciaro C, Mannering N, Candela V, Salvatore G, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review. The bone & joint journal. 2017;99-b (8):1053-60.12.Burnham JM, Wright V. Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Care in the Female Athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36(4):703-15.13.Harilainen A, Sandelin J. A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. The American journal of sports medicine. 2009;37(4):699-706.14.Madadi F, Tavakolian J, Maleki A, Rahimi M, Zandi R, Bigdeli MR. Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstraction (Comparsion between Three Different Fixation Techniqes).Iranian Journal of Orthpaedic Surgery. 2010;8(4):160-5
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |