1. 1- Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, et al. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Apr; 103(4): 534-42.
2- Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, et al. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May; 37(5): 352-8.
3- Waltric KB, de Abreu Junior MJ, Correa M, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: An in-vitro study. J Periodontal. 2012 Mar; 32(5): 367-70.
4- Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurement with the use of a cone beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 May; 40(2): 244-50.
5- Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, et al. Accuracy in measurements of distance using limited cone beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr; 19(2): 228-31.
6- Worthington P, RubensteinJ, Hatcher DC. The role of cone beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Oct; 141: 19-24.
7- Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes M, et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone- beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Sep; 108(3): 430-6.
8- Medelnik J Hertrich K, Steinhauser-Andresen, et al. Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT- based 3D images: an in-vitro study. J Orofac Orthop. 2011 Aug; 72(4):261-78.
9- Sokhon S, Nasseh I, Noujeim M. Using cone- beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement. Gen Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr; 59(2): 72-7.
10- Tustumi K, Chikui T, Okamura K, et al. Accuracy of linear measurement limits of thin objects with locations in the fields of view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb; 26(1): 91-100.
11- Al-Ekrish AA and Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone- beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiology. 2011; 40: 67-75.
12- Kohavi D, Bar-ziv J, Marmary Y. Effect of axial plane deviation on cross-sectional height in reformatted computed tomography of the mandible. DentOmaxillofac Radiology. 1997; 26: 189-191.
13- Shokri A, Khajeh. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60.
14- Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun; 25(3):499-505.
15- Bassam H, Van der Stelt, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr; 31(2): 129-34.
16- Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-New Tom). Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2004 Sep; 33(5): 291-4.
17- Sheikhi M, Horbanizadeh S, Abdinian M, Goroohi H, Badrian H. Accuracy of linear measurement of Gallileous cone beam computed tomography in normal and different head positions. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 214954.