[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main About journal Editorial Board Current Issue Archive Submit an article Site Map Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 2 (June 2015) ::
Int J Med Invest 2015, 4(2): 199-207 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of professionalism between medical students in clinical situations
Mahsa Shakour , Majid Badrian *
Msc Student, Medical Education Development Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract:   (10204 Views)
objectives: Professionalism is an important competency in medical education. Evaluation as a solution could help us to distinguish the current situation of professionalism. The aim of this article is to study the evaluation methods for professionalism in medical education. Methods and Materials: This paper reviews the analytic literature on evaluation of professionalism. We searched the approved databases in medical education by keywords related to evaluation of professionalism since 1999 until 2014 and found 23 best evidences to describe the evaluation in professionalism. Results: Evaluation of professionalism is studied according to content of evaluation, evaluator, time, place and methods. Content of evaluation is summarized in some sections like ethics, personality, professional principles. Evaluators are physicians, members of healthcare team and patients. The evaluation could be done in real or invitro environments. The methods of evaluations are diverse and the reliability and validity of them are suspicious. Conclusion: According to studied articles, the evaluation of professionalism is different of other evaluations in methods of evaluation, tools, time and evaluator. We can’t define a special tool for all details of professionalism, which is helpful in all situations. It’s better to apply a special tool for every detail and notice to measuring scores, validity and reliability of tools.
Keywords: Medical education, professionalism, assessment
Full-Text [PDF 502 kb]   (3870 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: General
References
1. 1.Doctors in society. Medical professionalism in a changing world. Clinical medicine (London, England). 2005;5(6 Suppl 1):S5-40. 2. Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2000;75(6):612-6. 3. Harden JRCMHDMFRM. AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 5-From competency to meta-competency: a model for the specification of learning outcomes. Medical teacher. 1999;21(6):546-52. 4. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Annals of internal medicine. 2002;136(3):243-6. 5. Nomura H. Developing the "why" facet of medical professionalism. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2008;24(1):31-4. 6. Passi V, Doug M, Peile E, Thistlethwaite J, Johnson N. Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Education. 2010;1:19-29. 7. Lee AG, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R, Oetting TA, Abramoff M, et al. Teaching and assessing professionalism in ophthalmology residency training programs. Survey of ophthalmology. 2007;52(3):300-14. 8. Bresciani MJ, Zelna CL, Anderson JA. Assessing student learning and development: A handbook for practitioners. Washington D.C: NASPA; 2004. 9. Schuh JH, Upcraft LM. Assessment practice in student affairs: An applications manual. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001. 10. RIDER EA, NAWOTNIAK RH. A Practical Guide to Teaching and Assessing the ACGME Core Competencies. Second Edition ed. United States of America: HCPro, Inc.; 2010 11. Bauer KW, Hanson GR. Assessment tips for student affairs professionals.: NASPA’s E-zine for Student Affairs Professionals 2001 [cited 2010]. Available from: http://www.naspa.org/membership/mem/nr/article.cfm?id=544. 12. Common Program Requirements: General Competencies the ACGME Board 2007. 13. Modi JN, Anshu, Gupta P, Singh T. Teaching and assessing professionalism in the Indian context. Indian pediatrics. 2014;51(11):881-8. 14. Professionalism in Medical Education: Office of Medical Education,east carolina university; 2007. Available from: http://www.ecu.edu/cs-dhs/medicaleducation/profMedicalEducation.cfm. 15. Lattore P, Lumb PD. Professionalism and interpersonal communications: ACGME competencies and core leadership development qualities. Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain 2005; 24:134-7. 16. Quinn JB, Anderson P, Finkelstein S. Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. Harvard business review. 1996;74(2):71-80. 17. Kearney RA. Defining professionalism in anaesthesiology. Medical education. 2005;39(8):769-76. 18. Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR. Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Medical teacher. 2004;26(4):366-73. 19. Elliott DD, May W, Schaff PB, Nyquist JG, Trial J, Reilly JM, et al. Shaping professionalism in pre-clinical medical students: Professionalism and the practice of medicine. Medical teacher. 2009;31(7):e295-302. 20. Bryan R, Krych A. assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the Gross Anatomy course. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005;34(8):486-91. 21. Cohen J. Foreword, in Measuring Medical Professionalism vi: Oxford U. Press 2006. 22. Veloski JJ, Fields SK, Boex JR, Blank LL. Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2005;80(4):366-70. 23. Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD. A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2009;84(5):551-8. 24. Anderson DK, Irwin KE. Self-assessment of professionalism in physical therapy education. Work (Reading, Mass). 2013;44(3):275-81. 25. Marrero I, Bell M, Dunn LB, Roberts LW. Assessing professionalism and ethics knowledge and skills: preferences of psychiatry residents. Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry. 2013;37(6):392-7. 26. Dwyer T, Glover Takahashi S, Kennedy Hynes M, Herold J, Wasserstein D, Nousiainen M, et al. How to assess communication, professionalism, collaboration and the other intrinsic CanMEDS roles in orthopedic residents: use of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Canadian journal of surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2014;57(4):230-6. 27. van Zanten M, Boulet JR, Norcini JJ, McKinley D. Using a standardised patient assessment to measure professional attributes. Medical education. 2005;39(1):20-9. 28. Wood J, Collins J, Burnside ES, Albanese MA, Propeck PA, Kelcz F, et al. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills. Academic radiology. 2004;11(8):931-9. 29. Gordon J. Assessing students' personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Medical education. 2003;37(4):335-40. 30. Chandler N, Henderson G, Park B, Byerley J, Brown WD, Steiner MJ. Use of a 360-degree evaluation in the outpatient setting: the usefulness of nurse, faculty, patient/family, and resident self-evaluation. Journal of graduate medical education. 2010;2(3):430-4. 31. Musick DW, McDowell SM, Clark N, Salcido R. Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists. 2003;82(5):394-402. 32. Khan R, Lee AG, Golnik KC, Paranilam J. Residency Education Professionalism Vignettes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(4):874-.e2. 33. TOOLBOX OF ASSESSMENT METHODS A Product of the Joint Initiative ACGME Outcomes Project Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. In: Specialties. ACfGMEaABoM, editor. . Version 1.1 ed2000. 34. ACGME Competencies: Suggested Best Methods for Evaluation. In: Methods AAJIAToA, editor. 1.1 ed2000. 35. Surdyk PM. Educating for professionalism: what counts? Who's counting? Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees. 2003;12(2):155-60. 36. Surdyk PM, Lynch DC, Leach DC. Professionalism: identifying current themes. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2003;16(6):597-602. 37. Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2002;77(6):502-15. 38. Klemenc-Ketis Z, Vrecko H. Development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2014;5:205-11. 39. Lombarts KM, Plochg T, Thompson CA, Arah OA. Measuring professionalism in medicine and nursing: results of a European survey. PloS one. 2014;9(5):e97069. 40. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;287(2):226-35. 41. Parker M. Assessing professionalism: theory and practice*. Medical teacher. 2006;28(5):399-403. 42. Teherani A, O'Sullivan PS, Lovett M, Hauer KE. Categorization of unprofessionalbehaviours identified during administration of and remediation after a comprehensive clinical performance examination using a validated professionalism framework. Medical teacher. 2009;31(11):1007-12. 43. Donald AB. Medical Education — Professionalism. The new england journal of medicine. 2007;6:356. 44. Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SR, Roberts TE. A systematic review of studies assessing and facilitating attitudes towards professionalism in medicine. Medical education. 2007;41(8):822-9.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shakour M, Badrian M. Assessment of professionalism between medical students in clinical situations. Int J Med Invest 2015; 4 (2) :199-207
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-127-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 2 (June 2015) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Medical Investigation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645